n the case of Tapati Bag v. Patipaban Ghosh reported in 1993 Cr.L.J
3932 (Cal.), it was held that if the Court considers that there are no sufficient
grounds for proceeding against the accused, the accused has to be discharged,
but if the Court is of the opinion after such consideration that there is ground
for presuming that the accused has committed the offence which is exclusively
triable by the Court of Session then the charge against the accused must be
framed. Once the charges are framed, the accused is put to trial and thereaftereither acquitted or convicted, but he cannot be discharged. Once charges are
framed under Section 228 of the code, there is no backgear for discharging the
accused under Section 227 of the code. Discharge post framing of charge is not
viewed in Cr.P.C.
Discharge of the accused in Cases Triable exclusively by Court of Sessions:
