JMFC Civil Judge Exam Material – Day-57-Proclamation in CRPC – A Complete Note

• Download Model Order Section 82 CRPC to Person in Gujarati
• Download Mode Order with Judgment For Accused in Gujarati
• Download Model Order with Judgement for 83 – attachment of Property in wnload Delhi High Court FullGujarati
• Download CRPC Model Format / Process For Section 82 – Form No. 04 in English
• Download CRPC Model Format / Process – Form No. 07 – 83 Crpc in English
• Form NO. 06 – attachment Process in English

82(4) મુજબ ના list માં જ નીકળી શકાય છે. અન્ય ગુના માં કાઢી શકાય નહિ. “Delhi High Court In Sanjay Bhandari Case held that :- Cannot be Made Against person Accused of Sections 406,420 IPC :- Only Limited to 82(4).

Download Delhi High Court Judgment

(82) CRPC
ફરાર વ્યક્તિ માટે ઘોષણા –
(1) જો કોઈપણ કોર્ટ પાસે એવું માનવાનું કારણ હોય (પછી ભલે પુરાવા લીધા પછી) આવી ઘોષણા પ્રકાશિત થયાની તારીખથી ત્રીસ દિવસ કરતાં ઓછા ન હોય તેવા ચોક્કસ સ્થળે અને ચોક્કસ સમયે હાજર થવું.

(2) આ ઘોષણા નીચે પ્રમાણે પ્રકાશિત કરવામાં આવશે- (i) a) તે નગર અથવા ગામની કેટલીક વિશિષ્ટ જગ્યાએ જાહેરમાં વાંચવામાં આવશે જ્યાં આવી વ્યક્તિ સામાન્ય રીતે રહે છે; b) તે ઘર અથવા ઘરની જગ્યા કે જેમાં આવી વ્યક્તિ સામાન્ય રીતે રહે છે અથવા આવા નગર અથવા ગામની કોઈ વિશિષ્ટ જગ્યા પર ચોંટાડવામાં આવશે; c) તેની એક નકલ કોર્ટ હાઉસના કેટલાક સ્પષ્ટ ભાગ પર ચોંટાડવામાં આવશે; (ii) કોર્ટ, જો તેને યોગ્ય લાગે તો, એવી વ્યક્તિ જ્યાં સામાન્ય રીતે રહે છે તે જગ્યાએ ફરતા થતા દૈનિક અખબારમાં પ્રકાશિત કરવામાં આવેલી જાહેરાતની નકલનો નિર્દેશ પણ કરી શકે છે.

(3)પેટા-કલમ (2) ના ખંડ (i) માં ઉલ્લેખિત રીતે, ચોક્કસ દિવસે જાહેરનામું યોગ્ય રીતે પ્રકાશિત કરવામાં આવ્યું હતું તે અસર માટે ઘોષણા જારી કરતી અદાલત દ્વારા લેખિતમાં નિવેદન, નિર્ણાયક પુરાવા હશે કે આની જરૂરિયાતો વિભાગનું પાલન કરવામાં આવ્યું છે, અને તે દિવસે જાહેરનામું પ્રકાશિત કરવામાં આવ્યું હતું.

(4) જ્યાં ઘોષણા પેટા વિભાગ હેઠળ પ્રકાશિત (1) એક વ્યક્તિ કલમ હેઠળ ગુનો સજા આરોપ સંદર્ભમાં છે 302 , 304 , 364 , 367 , 382 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 402 , 436 , 449 , 459 અથવા 460 ભારતીય દંડ સંહિતા (1860 નો 45) અને આવી વ્યક્તિ ઘોષણા દ્વારા જરૂરી નિર્દિષ્ટ સ્થાન અને સમયે હાજર થવામાં નિષ્ફળ જાય, તો કોર્ટ, યોગ્ય લાગે તેવી તપાસ કર્યા પછી, તેને જાહેર ગુનેગાર જાહેર કરી શકે છે અને તે અસર.
પેટા-કલમ (2) અને (3) ની જોગવાઈઓ પેટા-કલમ (4) હેઠળ કોર્ટ દ્વારા કરવામાં આવેલી ઘોષણાને લાગુ પડશે કારણ કે તે પેટા-કલમ (1) હેઠળ પ્રકાશિત થયેલ ઘોષણાને લાગુ પડે છે.

કલમ ૮૩

1. તેની મિલકતના સંપૂર્ણ અથવા કોઈપણ ભાગનો નિકાલ કરવાનો છે, અથવા
2. કોર્ટના સ્થાનિક અધિકારક્ષેત્રમાંથી તેની મિલકતના સંપૂર્ણ અથવા કોઈપણ ભાગને દૂર કરવા વિશે છે
   તે જાહેરાતના મુદ્દા સાથે વારાફરતી જોડાણનો આદેશ આપી શકે છે.

• આવો હુકમ તે જે જિલ્લામાં કરવામાં આવ્યો હોય તેની અંદર આવી વ્યક્તિની કોઈપણ મિલકતના જોડાણને અધિકૃત કરશે; અને તે જિલ્લા મેજિસ્ટ્રેટ દ્વારા સમર્થન આપવામાં આવે ત્યારે આવા જિલ્લા વિનાની વ્યક્તિની કોઈપણ મિલકતની જોડાણને અધિકૃત કરશે જેમના જિલ્લામાં આવી મિલકત આવેલી છે.
• જો જપ્ત કરવાનો આદેશ આપવામાં આવેલ મિલકત દેવું અથવા અન્ય જંગમ મિલકત હોય, તો આ કલમ હેઠળ જોડાણ કરવામાં આવશે-
  1. જપ્તી દ્વારા; અથવા
  2. રીસીવરની નિમણૂક દ્વારા; અથવા
  3. ઘોષિત વ્યક્તિ અથવા તેના વતી કોઈપણ વ્યક્તિને આવી મિલકતની ડિલિવરી પર પ્રતિબંધ મૂકતા લેખિતમાં આદેશ દ્વારા; અથવા
  4. કોર્ટને યોગ્ય લાગે તેમ તમામ અથવા કોઈપણ બે પદ્ધતિઓ દ્વારા.
• જો સંલગ્ન કરવાનો આદેશ આપવામાં આવેલ મિલકત સ્થાવર હોય, તો આ કલમ હેઠળની જોડાણ, રાજ્ય સરકારને મહેસૂલ ચૂકવતી જમીનના કિસ્સામાં, તે જિલ્લાના કલેક્ટર દ્વારા કરવામાં આવશે જ્યાં જમીન સ્થિત છે, અને અન્ય તમામ કેસોમાં-
  1. કબજો લઈને; અથવા
  2. રીસીવરની નિમણૂક દ્વારા; અથવા
  3. ઘોષિત વ્યક્તિ અથવા તેના વતી કોઈપણ વ્યક્તિને મિલકતની ડિલિવરી પર ભાડાની ચુકવણી પર પ્રતિબંધ મૂકતા લેખિતમાં આદેશ દ્વારા; અથવા
  4. કોર્ટને યોગ્ય લાગે તેમ તમામ અથવા કોઈપણ બે પદ્ધતિઓ દ્વારા.
• જો ટાંચમાં લેવાનો આદેશ આપવામાં આવેલ મિલકતમાં લાઇવ-સ્ટોકનો સમાવેશ થાય છે અથવા તે નાશવંત પ્રકૃતિની હોય, તો કોર્ટ, જો તેને યોગ્ય લાગે તો, તેના તાત્કાલિક વેચાણનો આદેશ આપી શકે છે, અને આવા કિસ્સામાં વેચાણની આવક કોર્ટના આદેશનું પાલન કરશે. .
• આ કલમ હેઠળ નિયુક્ત રીસીવરની સત્તાઓ, ફરજો અને જવાબદારીઓ સિવિલ પ્રોસિજર કોડ, 1908 (1908 નો 5) હેઠળ નિયુક્ત રીસીવરની સમાન હશે.

Conditions to make a Proclamation

Section 82 of the CrPC has laid down the conditions when a person could be proclaimed as an absconding offender. In situations when a Court has issued a warrant against a person and the Court has a reason to believe that such person has either eloped or is concealing himself so as to ditch the Court, the Court may issue an order of proclamation against such person, ordering them to appear before the Court on a certain date, at a certain time.

IMPORTANT JUDGEMENT

Trigala Veeraya v. State

In the case of Trigala Veeraya v. State, the Court laid down that the Government exercises the same rights as a coparcener in cases where the attachment of a part of joint family property is concerned.

Vinod Khanna v. State

In the case of Vinod Kumar Khanna v. State, the notice of the order of proclamation had to be sent to the petitioner but the same could not be done since the petitioner was in a foreign country at the time. Therefore, the notice was sent to an official of the company where the petitioner was a chairman at. The said official gave an intimation of the appearance of the petitioner before the Investigating Officer on his failure to do so. An arrest warrant was issued against the petitioner which also remained unexecuted. Finally, the Court issued a proclamation under Section 82 of the CrPC and ordered the attachment of property under Section 83 of the Code. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal against the issuance of a proclamation by virtue of Section 482 of the CrPC. The Counsel argued on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner did not attempt to escape the warrant of arrest. Further, he claimed that the arrest warrant never came into his knowledge and therefore, he could not have possibly absconded.

The Court held that such facts were insufficient to conclude that the petitioner did not abscond from the Court for the reason that petitioner had several officials who were working in India and it was non-convincible that he would not have been apprised by anyone of the notices and issue or arrest warrant against him. Further, the petitioner had begun the execution of a power of attorney to dispose of his assets to prevent the attachment of property. These facts and acts of the petitioner could lead to the conclusion that the petitioner was aware of all notices and the arrest warrant and evaded the same, and could be said to have absconded. Thus, this case makes it evident that the knowledge of the issuance of an order of appearance in any form whatsoever, followed by a non-appearance, is essential to conclude that a person is absconding.

Moideen v. The Sub Inspector of Police

In Moideen vs The Sub Inspector Of Police, petitioner was the sixth accused in the case and was absconding. As a result, his case was separated from the other accused persons and the provisions of Sections 82 and 83 of the CrPC were applied and his property was attached. Thereafter, the petitioner surrendered before the Magistrate and was later released on bail. The petitioner filed a petition u/s 85(3) of the CrPC for the release of his attached property since he was released on bail and was no longer absconding. The said appeal was dismissed by the Magistrate and later, by the Sessions Judge too. The dismissal is challenged in this revision. The facts of the case are undisputed.

The issue was whether an absconding accused, whose property is attached u/s 83 of the CrPC, can file an application after the expiry of two years from the date of such attachment to release the said property under the provisions of Section 85 of the Code?

The Court held that an absconding accused is entitled to get the property released within the time period specified in the proclamation or within two years from the date of attachment of property given that he/she establishes that they were not absconding or concealing themselves nor did they receive the notice of proclamation to enable them to appear before the Court on time. In the expiration of the aforementioned period, the accused would not be entitled to file an application of the release of property u/s 85(3) of the CrPC. Here, the petitioner failed to establish that he was not absconding and did not receive the notice of proclamation, making him unqualified to get his property released. The petition was therefore dismissed.

Vimalben Ajitbhai Patel v. Vatsalabeen Ashokbhai Patel and Ors.

In the case of Vimalben Ajitbhai Patel v. Vatsalabeen Ashokbhai Patel and Ors., the appellants were the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent (Sonalben Rameshchandra Desai). The respondent separated from her husband. After a year, she filed a complaint petition against her husband and the appellants for the offences of abetment to the commission of a crime and criminal breach of trust under Sections 114 and 406 of the IPC respectively. The appellants were granted bail on the condition that they would not leave India without the permission of the Court. However, the appellants filed an application in Court citing health issues of father-in-law, to seek permission to leave India. They left India before their application could be processed.

Later, the respondent filed an application in the High Court for cancellation of their bail, which was accepted by the High Court, directing the Metropolitan Magistrate to issue a Standing Warrant against the appellants upon their return to India.

The Court held that Section 82 of the CrPC was enacted to secure the presence of the accused before the Court. On the achievement of the said purpose, the attachment shall be withdrawn and the property that had been attached shall be restored for the CrPC does not provide for the sale of the property after the proclaimed offender has surrendered or has obtained bail. This is so because once an accused surrenders before the Court and their standing warrant(s) is/are cancelled, they are no longer an absconder and the entire purpose behind attaching their property is achieved.

The Court observed that once the person is no more absconding, the matters pertaining to the attached property shall remain between the accused and the State and the Complainant shall derive no benefit therefrom. In this case, the complainant is the daughter-in-law of the respondent and she contended that she is entitled to a share in the property attached. In the event where the property has to be sold, it is vested upon the State to do so from an order under Section 85 of the CrPC. It cannot depend on the execution of a decree, especially the ones of a third party who have no title, right or interest in the said property.

For More Information at https://blog.ipleaders.in/circumstances-proclamation-attachment-can-made-crpc/

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What Is Proclamation and Attachment Under CrPC

Where the summons for the attendance of the accused person is to be issued, but the court believes the accused may abscond or when the accused fails to appear before the court without any reasonable cause, a warrant of arrest is issued.

Now, the warrant of arrest has been issued, and there is reason to believe that the accused has absconded or is hiding himself to avoid the execution of the warrant. The court may publish a written proclamation requiring the accused to appear before the court and may attach his property.

If the accused fails to appear after the proclamation as well, the court may also attach the property of the accused, and the property will be at the State Government’s disposal.

When a Court May Publish a Written Proclamation?

If any court has a reason to believe that any person against whom a warrant has been issued;

1. has absconded, or
2. is concealing himself

Then a court may publish a written proclamation specifying the place and time (not less than 30 days from the date of such publication) for him to appear.

Essentials of Proclamation.

According to the Criminal Procedure Code, these are the four essentials of proclamation:

1. The proclamation shall be read publicly in the part of the town or village where such person resides;
2. The written proclamation shall be affixed to some conspicuous (clearly visible) part of the house in which such person resides;
3. A copy of such publication will also be affixed at the courthouse;
4. If the court thinks fit, it may order to publish such publication in a daily newspaper circulating in the area where such person resides.

Attachment of Property

Anytime after the proclamation under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court may order attachment of property, whether movable or immovable belonging to the proclaimed person. Reasons shall be recorded for such attachment.

Attachment may be ordered simultaneously with proclamation if the court has a reason to believe that the person proclaimed is about to:

1. dispose of the whole or any part of the property,
2. remove the whole or part of the property from the local jurisdiction of the court.

The property attached will be at the disposal of the State Government.

Claims and objections to attached property.

Claims and objections can be made by the interested person other than the person proclaimed for the attached property within six months from the date of attachment.

Such a claim or objection shall be inquired into and may be allowed or disallowed in whole or in part.

Release, sale and restoration of attached property under section 86 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

If the proclaimed person appears before the learned court within the time specified, his property shall be released.

If the proclaimed person doesn’t appear within the time specified, the property comes at the disposal of the State Government. But it shall not be sold until;

1. Six months expires from the date of attachment.
2. Any claim or objection is disposed of.

Unless the property is perishable in nature or if the court considers that the sale would benefit the owner.

If within two years of the date of attachment, the person whose property was at the disposal of State Government appears or is brought before the court. In this case, the property or the sale proceeds will be delivered to him if he satisfies the court that he did not abscond or conceal himself.

According to section 86 of the Criminal Procedure Code, any person who is aggrieved by the refusal of delivery of property or sale proceeds may appeal to the court, to which appeal ordinarily lies from the sentences of the first-mentioned court.